Horton v. Chamberlain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendants were entitled to qualified immunity because their incremental and combined use IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 233
• “[T]he nonmoving party must come forward with evidence that would be sufficient to support a jury verdict in its favor.”
• “No genuine dispute of material fact exists when the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.”
• “No genuine dispute of material fact exists when the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.”
• “No genuine dispute of material fact exists when the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.”
• “No genuine dispute of material fact exists when the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).