Skip to main content
· 11/9/1995

Horton v. American Tobacco Co.

Citations

  • 667 So. 2d 1289
  • 1995 WL 656911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury considered comparative fault and held that plaintiff was solely responsible for his injury
  • jury was given a comparative fault instruction, and the verdict which was obviously based on a finding of 100% fault on the part of the decedent was justified by the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Banks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.