Horst v. Columbia Contract Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court must still apply the ad hoc factors even if there is evidence of a pattern-or-practice claim
• stating that the second stage certification analysis occurs \[a]t the conclusion of discovery\
• explaining that Congress adopted the “similarly situated” standard instead of Rule 23 standards
• explaining that Congress adopted the “similarly situated” standard instead of Rule 23 standards
• providing that similarity is determined on an “ad hoc, case-by-case basis”
• requiring for conditional certification “nothing more than substantial allegations that the putative class members were together the victims of a single decision, policy, or plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).