Horsman v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the Tax Court for “failing to adhere to the unambiguous language contained in the statutes in question”
• reversing the Tax Court for “failing to adhere to the unambiguous language contained in the statutes in question”
• reversing the Tax Court for \failing to adhere to the unambiguous language contained in the statutes in question\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).