Horrell v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the plaintiffs argument that the existence of a duty could not be addressed in a motion for summary judgment
• “[T]he ‘duties’ *** that are found in section 3-103(a) regarding the execution of a plan[ ] are derived from the basic common law duty articulated in section 3-102.”
• the City does not have a duty to improve its property
• the City does not have a duty to improve its property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).