Hornick v. Owners Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is the insurer’s duty to define terms in clear and explicit language
• holding the UIM policy provision at issue “may be viewed as an attempt to avoid duplication of insurance coverage and is therefore permitted under Iowa Code section 516A.2” (emphasis added)
• holding the UIM policy provision at issue \may be viewed as an attempt to avoid duplication of insurance coverage and is therefore permitted under Iowa Code section 516A.2\ (emphasis added)
• stating that “uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage protects ... the person, not the vehicle”
• upholding provision that extended UIM coverage only to relatives of named insured “who [do] not own a car” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).