Horne v. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that first factor weighed in favor of decertification because plaintiffs' varying responsibilities and duties resulted in \claims [that] are simply too varied.... Plaintiffs' 'other' claims vary from assignment to assignment and individual to individual\
• explaining that some, deputies were assigned to work directly with inmates at a jail while others worked in “office-style cubicles”
• noting, “[decertification is appropriate where plaintiffs are subject to varying work conditions in different work locations or under different supervisors”
• in context of donning and doffing claim, variations in how deputies wear uniforms not material
• finding de-minimis defense in donning/doffing case subject to common proof
• “single policy, custom or practice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).