Hornby v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether long-term disability benefits are “wages” under Iowa Code chapter 91A involves statutory interpretation, a question of law for the court to determine
• “We are guided by what the legislature actually said, rather than what it might have or should have said.”
• “We are guided by what the legislature actually said, rather than that which it might or should have said.”
• “We are guided by what the legislature actually said, rather than what it might have or should have said.”
• “Iowa Code section 17A.19(1) requires a party to ‘exhaust[ ] all adequate administrative remedies’ prior to bringing an action in court to challenge ‘agency action.’”
• long-term disability benefits were “wages” under § 91A.2(7)(c) where plaintiff had a contractual right to such benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).