Skip to main content

Horn v. State

Citations

  • 775 So. 2d 1007
  • 2001 WL 37718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[w]e need not address th[at] claim [an incorrect calculation in his sentencing guidelines scoresheet] because defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender and the guidelines scoresheet is irrelevant”
  • finding that \[w]e need not address that claim [an incorrect calculation in his sentencing guidelines scoresheet] because defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender and the guidelines scoresheet is irrelevant\
  • finding that “[w]e need not address th[at] claim [an incorrect calculation in his sentencing guidelines scoresheet] because defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender and the guidelines scoresheet is irrelevant”
  • holding habitual sentence rendered guidelines scoresheet irrelevant
  • elaim of incorrect calculation in sentencing guidelines score-sheet need not be reached if defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender
  • “[W]e need not address [defendant’s] claim [that there was an incorrect calculation in his sentencing guidelines scoresheet] because defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender and the guidelines scoresheet is irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cope, Gersten and Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.