Horn v. Fadal MacHining Centers, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that authority supporting only general propositions of law is not sufficient to satisfy Rule 28(a)(10) and that, when no authority is cited, the effect is the same as if no argument had been made
• providing that a claim under the same doctrine can be won by showing the product failed to meet consumer expectations
• providing that a claim under the same doctrine can be won by showing the product failed to meet consumer expectations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).