Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/6/1992
Horn v. Davis Electrical Constructors, Inc.
Citations
- 416 S.E.2d 634
- 307 S.C. 559
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that § 41-1-80 “does not singularly accord to an employee the right to a reasonable period of time for rehabilitation to demonstrate the ability to perform his former employment”
- holding that § 41-1-80 “does not singularly accord to an employee the right to a reasonable period of time for rehabilitation to demonstrate the ability to perform his former employment”
- holding reinstatement, as an equitable remedy, is similar to injunctive relief and therefore discretionary
- holding reinstatement, as an equitable remedy, is similar to injunctive relief and therefore discretionary
- where temporal proximity of injury and discharge existed, “in addition to other retaliatory evidence in the record as well as [employer’s] admission that evidence of retaliation existed,” plaintiff established termination in violation of statute
- when construing a statute, courts must determine the intent of the legislature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finney, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.