Horn v. Corkland Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• owner did not testify to any difference in value of property although under Florida law, an owner of property can testify as to his opinion of the value of the property
• owner of property can testify to value of his property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Weitzer Oak Park Estate, Ltd. v. Petto
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-29· cited 13×
• Kay v. Katzen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-02· cited 7×
• Horizon Leasing v. Leefmans
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-12· cited 7×
• Stockman v. Duke
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-26· cited 3×
• Reliance Insurance Co. v. Pro-Tech Conditioning & Heating
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-25· cited 2×
• W.S.M. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-23· cited 1×
• GARY I. MANHEIMER v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-08-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harbond, Inc. v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-11-22· cited 45×
• Martel v. Carlson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-03-03· cited 15×
• Florida Power Corp. v. Scudder
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-09-16· cited 15×
• Dragstrem v. Butts
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-04-24· cited 11×
• Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co. v. Blanton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-06-17· cited 8×
• Insurance Company of North America v. Twitty
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-07-18· cited 7×
• Moore v. Leisure Pool Service, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-17· cited 7×
• Clark v. JW Conner & Sons, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-21· cited 6×