Skip to main content
· 3/14/1887

Horn v. Buck

Citations

  • 5 Sadler 480
  • 8 A. 609

Syllabus

<p>In assumpsit by an executor for the unpaid balance of purchase money of land conveyed by the testator to his son, the question whether the son was to pay the full money consideration mentioned in the deed or was to have the land partly as a gift is a question for the jury.</p> <p>Note. — Where there is any evidence to show that the property was transferred by the decedent as a gift, the question is for the jury. Patterson v. Dushane, 115 Pa. 334, 8 Atl. 440; Flanigan v. Flanigan, 115 Pa. 233, 9 Atl. 157; Jacques v. Fourthman, 137 Pa. 428, 20 Atl. 802; Osterhout’s Estate, 148 Pa. 223, 23 Atl. 1069; Kulp v. March, 181 Pa. 627, 59 Am. St. Rep. 687, 37 Atl. 913.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employer’s cooking utensil products too ordinary and well known to allow enforcement of noncompete covenant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.