Horn & Hardart Co. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “a petition for further relief can be brought so long as the petitioner is not barred by laches” and holding a request for further relief “filed less than two months after the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming [the court’s prior decision] ... was undoubtedly timely.”
• ‘‘In this case, the policy driving rule 13 (a) must give way to a more important concern. When [the defendant] filed a rule 12 (b
• “both proper and efficient for 17 [prevailing defendant] to prosecute its claims in a petition for 18 further relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).