Horizon Outdoor v. City of Industry, California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the urgency ordinance defendant had adopted “incorporate^] by reference many of the provisions” of the initial, unconstitutional ordinance
• \Dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims on the grounds of mootness is therefore not appropriate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).