Horizon Holdings v. Genmar Holdings, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]t is beyond dispute that at-will employment contracts ... differ significantly from commercial contracts,” and that the differences between the two militate against implying a covenant of good faith and fair dealing to at-will employment contracts
• explaining that a district court’s finding regarding waiver of an argument by failing to timely raise it is a “fact-intensive question” that this court reviews for abuse of discretion
• finding that the Supreme Court of Delaware would not require such a showing
• affirming district court’s refusal to award plaintiffs contractual rate of post- 5 judgment interest because plaintiffs did not provide defendants adequate notice of such claim
• affirming district court’s refusal to award 21 plaintiffs contractual rate of post-judgment interest because plaintiffs did not provide defendants 22 adequate notice of such claim
• observing that “Kansas generally recognizes [] contractual choice-of-law provisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).