Horine v. Hammond
Citations
- 94 Kan. 579
- 146 P. 1144
- 1915 Kan. LEXIS 131
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Personal Injuries — Defective Floor — Falling Scaffold — Evidence Sufficient Against Demurrer Thereto. An examination of the abstracts discloses that there was some evidence tending to prove each fact necessary to be established to prove the plaintiff’s case, and for that reason a demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled.</p> <p>2. Same — Verdict Approved by Trial Court — Not Disturbed. A general verdict, approved by a trial court, when based on sufficient, although conflicting evidence, will not be disturbed by the supreme court.</p>
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Backus v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas· 1863-03-15· cited 25×
- Every v. RainsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-04-08· cited 15×
- Barnett v. United Kansas Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1914-03-07· cited 13×
- Mason v. HarlowSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-07-23· cited 11×
- Sibley v. Kansas City Cotton-mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1911-07-07· cited 8×
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. BurgessSupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-12-09· cited 4×
- Wells v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1913-07-05· cited 3×
- Higgins v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1905-02-11· cited 2×
- Fleener v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1914-06-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.