Horan v. Newyork

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “advocacy on behalf of disabled students constitute[s] protected activity under the Rehabilitation Act”
• holding that employee’s act of filing an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”
• observing that the standard for retaliation claims under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act is the same
• observing that “advocacy” on behalf of students and lodging complaints constitute protected activity under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act
• noting that this standard comes from cases arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and explaining that same standard applies in ADA and RA cases
• observing that “[a]cts that carry a significant risk of humiliation [or] harm to future employment prospects” may be adverse actions but a “mere inconvenience” will not suffice (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).