Horaist v. Doctor's Hospital of Opelousas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney is a “necessary witness” for purposes of Tennessee Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7(a
• “Because Toce is not a necessary witness, we need not reach the question whether the substantial hardship to Horaist outweighs the appearance of impropriety and other policy considerations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).