Skip to main content
· 12/6/1989

Horacio O. Ferrea North American Div., Inc. v. MOROSO PERF. PROD., INC.

Citations

  • 553 So. 2d 336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s decision to permit or refuse amendment to pleadings will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion; “the crucial consideration in both motions to amend and to conform to the evidence is the test of prejudice”
  • “The crucial consideration in both motions to amend and motions to amend to conform with the evidence is the test of prejudice”
  • first citing New River Yachting Ctr. v. Bacchiocchi, 407 So. 2d 607, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); then citing Lasar Manufacturing Co. v. Bachanov, 436 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); and then citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunther

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.