Horace Case v. Arthur E. Morrisette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here is no basis for resort to the law of dedication because the record nowhere indicates that the District of Columbia has ever accepted [the property].”
• substantial evidence and clearly erroneous not synonymous
• substantial evidence and clearly erroneous not synonymous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).