Hopson v. Brunwankel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for mistrial based on venireperson’s ambiguous statements about the defendant’s prior “case”
• concluding Sanchez failed to demonstrate harm because he could not identify another juror who heard the prejudicial remarks and was thereby influenced to hold them against Sanchez

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).