Skip to main content
· 2/7/1992

Hoppy's Oil Service, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Citations

  • 783 F. Supp. 1505
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1719
  • 1992 WL 23664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vitiating duty to defend where property acquired after expiration of coverage
  • “No duty to defend or to participate in a defense can arise before the insurer has notice of the suit against the insured, or at least of the underlying claim and the likelihood of suit”
  • loss of ability to determine whether pollution exclusion barred coverage
  • “Under ‘occurrence’ coverage, as commonly construed and applied in Massachusetts . . . and other states as well, an entity making a tort claim against the insured must sustain harm within the period of the policy in order to assert a claim to which the insurance applies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keeton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.