Hopping v. Whirlaway, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking this analysis a step further, and granting a new trial on ground of inconsistent verdicts where jury found against the bar which served first, but in favor of the bar which served later
• sufficient evidence for jury where acquaintance described patron who later had accident as appearing to feel “pretty good”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).