Hopper v. Hopper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a party seeking to change custody must establish that circumstances have substantially changed since the most recent custodial order, and that any events that took place before the prior proceedings cannot be used to show changed circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shydler v. Shydler
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 18×
• McGuinness v. McGuinness
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 18×
• MacK-manley v. Manley
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-20· cited 14×
• Nance v. Ferraro
  Court of Appeals of Nevada· 2018-04-05· cited 7×
• NANCE v. FERRARO
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-04-05
• NANCE VS. FERRARO (CHILD CUSTODY)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-04-05
• ROMANO v. ROMANO (CHILD CUSTODY) C/W 81439
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-01-13

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sims v. Sims
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-12-22· cited 39×
• Murphy v. Murphy
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1968-12-11· cited 36×
• Mosley v. Figliuzzi
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-01-03· cited 25×
• Atkins v. Atkins
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1927-09-13· cited 20×
• McMonigle v. McMonigle
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 18×
• Primm v. Lopes
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-05-27· cited 18×
• Truax v. Truax
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-05-19· cited 13×
• Wiese v. Granata
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 12×
• In re the Marriage of Stevens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-07-10· cited 11×
• Khaldy v. Khaldy
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 8×