Hopkins v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issuance of revised operating handbook did not recommence running of Indiana's statute of repose
• rejecting plaintiffs argument that operator manual/handbook was replacement part for purposes of statute of repose; holding the instruction page was not a separate product so as to recommence the running of the statute of repose
• finding Indiana statute of repose was not unconstitutional under state or federal constitutions
• \the essence of plaintiffs' claims regarding the Beechcraft A23A Musketeer fuel system is failure to warn of a dangerous condition which existed at the time of the original manufacture and delivery of the aircraft in 1967\
• under some products liability statutes, repose period begins when purchaser receives product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).