Hopkins & Hammond v. Withrow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inferring from judge's extension of 209A order that he found victim reasonably in fear of imminent serious physical harm
• although judge did not make findings of fact, appellate court could discern reasonable basis for 209A order from judge's ruling extending it
• specific findings of fact are not required \where we are able to discern a reasonable basis for the order in the judge's rulings and order\
• where reasonable basis for judge's rulings and order is discernible, no specific findings required
• \it was ultimately up to the judge to determine the credibility of the witnesses\
• where reasonable basis for judge's rulings and order is discernible, no specific findings required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).