Hope v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact that judge found defendant guilty of civil contempt legally insufficient to disqualify the judge from adjudication of a criminal contempt charge against the defendant
• claim that the trial judge who had previously adjudicated defendant guilty of civil contempt would be prejudiced and would be a necessary witness in the defendant’s criminal contempt proceeding arising from the same acts insufficient to warrant disqualification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dragovich v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-05-29· cited 23×
• State v. Shaw
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-12· cited 22×
• Puckett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-03· cited 3×
• Hope v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-11· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McDonald v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-11-07· cited 60×
• Jenny v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-03-08· cited 19×
• Starchk v. Wittenberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-31· cited 15×
• State v. Schell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-05-07· cited 15×
• Croft v. Culbreath
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1942-03-03· cited 11×
• Bryant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-11-03· cited 9×
• Pendley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-12-31· cited 9×
• Aiello v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-10-22· cited 4×
• State v. McSwain
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-09· cited 2×