Hope v. Cortines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the exhaustion requirement applies to Section 1983 claims which seek relief that IDEA could provide
• “The Second Circuit in Heldman effectively collapsed (2) and (3) above into the futility exception...See also Pol-era, at 489-90 (stating that exhaustion is futile if the “administrative procedures do not provide adequate remedies.”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).