Hope v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• value must be proved because, among other things, “[o]ur statutes ... prescribe the punishment for larceny ... with reference to the value of the property stolen”
• value must be proved because, among other things, “[o]ur statutes . . . pre- scribe the punishment for larceny . . . with reference to the value of the property stolen”
• the “value of the property alleged to be stolen must be set forth in the indictment” in part because “[o]ur statutes . . . prescribe the punishment for larceny, with reference to the value of the property stolen”
• the “value of the property alleged to be stolen must be set forth in the Cite as: 567 U. S. (2012) 11 Opinion of the Court indictment” in part because “[o]ur statutes . . . prescribe the punishment for larceny, with reference to the value of the property stolen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Alleyne v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
• Southern Union Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 296×
• United States v. Griffin
  D. Massachusetts· 2007-06-06· cited 16×
• United States v. Henderson
  S.D. West Virginia· 2000-07-19· cited 13×
• State v. Fortune
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1923-06-22· cited 9×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1804-11-15· cited 15×