Skip to main content
· 2/28/2014

Hope 7 Monroe Street Ltd. Partnership v. Riaso, LLC (In Re Hope 7 Monroe Street Ltd. Partnership)

Citations

  • 408 U.S. App. D.C. 347
  • 743 F.3d 867
  • 2014 WL 775454
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3809
  • 59 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he movant must show the misconduct was prejudicial, foreclosing the ‘full and fair preparation or presentation of its case.’” (citation omitted)
  • “As in other jurisdictional contexts, the party invoking appellate jurisdiction to review a bankruptcy court order has the burden of demonstrating prudential standing.”
  • “We have dismissed as moot appeals where the operation of § 363(m) has left us unable to fashion a remedy to address appellants’ asserted injury.”
  • “A bankruptcy court’s findings of fact are reviewed under a ‘clearly erroneous’ standard. . . . By contrast, ‘a district court reviews questions of law de novo on appeal.’” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Brown, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.