Hoover v. Stine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• party could not collaterally attack underlying judgment through an appeal of an attorney fee award
• “Whether a written contract is ambiguous and, if not deemed ambiguous, how the unambiguous contractual language should be construed, are questions of law that we review de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).