Hoover v. Cutts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it sufficient to allege that a fiduciary allocated nearly one third of a plan to a “highly risky investment[]” and the same fiduciary allocated only five percent and seven percent of its other plans to that same investment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).