Skip to main content
· 10/25/1918

Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schafer Ball Bearings Co.

Citations

  • 89 N.J. Eq. 433
  • 105 A. 500
  • 4 Stock. 433
  • 1918 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that OCGA § 16-1-8 (c) imposes “a statutory limitation to some successive prosecutions”
  • “The proof necessary to establish possession with intent to distribute is (1) possession of a controlled substance and (2) the in- tent to distribute it.”
  • OCGA § 16-13-30 requires same mens rea as similar federal statute, even though requirement is not express
  • OCGA § 16-13-30 requires same mens rea as similar federal statute, even though requirement is not express

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.