Skip to main content
· 5/24/1996

Hoover Group, Inc. v. Custom Metalcraft, Inc., and Dwayne Holden

Citations

  • 84 F.3d 1408
  • 38 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1860
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11900
  • 1996 WL 276428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that venue for claims against corporate officer/owner for acts of infringement by the corporation “may reasonably be based on the venue provisions for the corporation”
  • noting that “venue is based on the facts alleged in the well-pleaded complaint”
  • noting the distinction between torts committed in the course of an officer’s employment and other culpable wrongful acts
  • noting appeal was from decisions of United States District Court for District of Nebraska
  • “When personal wrongdoing is not supported by legitimate corporate activity, the courts have assigned personal liability for wrongful actions even when taken on behalf of the corporation.”
  • “It is an insufficient basis for personal liability that the officer had knowledge of the acts alleged to constitute infringement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Newman, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.