Hooten v. Conklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that corporate resolution and signature card allowing employee authority to sign and endorse checks for deposit gave her authority to do so
• holding that bank “is not liable for any abuse of [agent’s] authority” when she had been authorized to do so and bank had her listed as an authorized signatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).