Hoopes v. Carota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the attorney‐client privilege “constitutes an obstacle to the truth‐finding process” and, thus, its “invocation should be cautiously observed to ensure that its application is consistent with its purpose”
• explaining that the attorney-client privilege “constitutes an obstacle to the truth-finding process” and, thus, its “invocation should be cautiously observed to ensure that its application is consistent with its purpose”
• noting to the burden and holding an exception to privilege applied where “defendant failed to advance a basis upon which the attorney-client privilege should appropriately be extended to the information sought”
• Appellate Division viewed Gamer standard as more consistent with general New York views concerning attorney-client privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
  California Supreme Court· 2000-01-13· cited 77×
• Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-09-28· cited 33×
• Hoopes v. Carota
  New York Court of Appeals· 1989-06-08· cited 30×
• Stenovich v. Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
  New York Supreme Court· 2003-01-02· cited 24×
• AMBAC Indemnity Corp. v. Bankers Trust Co.
  New York Supreme Court· 1991-03-22· cited 17×
• Stock v. Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-06-30· cited 14×
• Murphy v. Gorman
  D. New Mexico· 2010-06-09· cited 11×
• NAMA Holdings, LLC v. Greenberg Traurig LLP
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-10-08· cited 7×
• Hammerman v. Northern Trust Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-06-03· cited 6×
• In re the Bank of New York Mellon
  New York Supreme Court· 2013-05-20· cited 4×
• Official Committee of Asbestos of G-I Holding, Inc. v. Heyman
  S.D. New York· 2006-04-28· cited 3×
• Lawrence v. Cohn
  S.D. New York· 2002-04-29· cited 2×
• In Re: Estate of McAleer Apl of: W. McAleer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-04-07
• Delta Financial Corp. v. Morrison
  New York Supreme Court· 2006-05-09

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Priest v. Hennessy
  New York Court of Appeals· 1980-07-08· cited 221×
• Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C. v. Zimmer
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1976-04-09· cited 95×
• In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Jacqueline F.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1979-05-08· cited 89×
• Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, Local 35 v. Washington Star Co.
  District of Columbia· 1982-07-16· cited 69×
• Hughson v. St. Francis Hospital
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-05-16· cited 62×
• People v. Tissois
  New York Court of Appeals· 1988-07-06· cited 57×
• Quintel Corp., N v. v. Citibank, N.A.
  S.D. New York· 1983-07-18· cited 36×
• Estate of Torian v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-04-24· cited 20×
• Arnold Constable Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage & Realty Trust
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-10-06· cited 10×
• Hoopes v. Bruno
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-03-19· cited 7×
• Beard v. Ames
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-11-04· cited 6×