Hoopes Bros. & Thomas Co. v. Trower

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that complaint stated an equitable estoppel claim arising from misrepresentation by an employer “through its authorized agent or employee”
• requiring proof of material misrepresentation, reasonable and detrimental reliance upon the representation, extraordinary circumstances, ambiguous plan provisions, and representations involving an oral interpretation of the plan
• “Section 4.6 requires that those statements be considered ‘correct and final,’ yet section 2.01 indicates that they cannot be ‘correct and final’ because Spink was over the age of sixty at the time they were issued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).