Indiana Court of Appeals· 12/9/2002
Hooper v. State
Citations
- 779 N.E.2d 596
- 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 2051
- 2002 WL 31744691
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial court is in the best position to assess the effect of discovery violations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoffman, Brook, Kirsch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 191×
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-04-03· cited 64×
- Dye v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-30· cited 57×
- Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-12-20· cited 19×
- Lyons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-10-06· cited 18×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-09-22· cited 17×
- Kidd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-11-16· cited 16×
- Gardner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-02-28· cited 8×
- Sappenfield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-04-18· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.