Hooper v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming that an appellant’s statements were confessions for purposes of analyzing a claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a corroboration 34 jury charge
• “[N]o specific manner of corroboration of the confession is required, and corroboration in any particular is sufficient.” (citation and punctation omitted)
• the 10 appellant failed to show a reasonable probability of a different outcome where there was evidence sufficient to corroborate the confession and there was other strongly inculpatory evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blocker v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-06-21· cited 25×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-05-16· cited 16×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-05-31· cited 9×
• Simmons v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-10-25· cited 8×
• Rayton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-06-22· cited 2×
• Hart v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-06-24
• Jester v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-09-16
• Terrell Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-03-27
• Tabb v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2026-06-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Waller v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
• DELOACH v. THE STATE (And Vice Versa)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-02-10· cited 23×
• Muckle v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-12-11· cited 20×
• English v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-01-23· cited 19×
• Clarke v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-05-04· cited 19×
• Morris v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-04-20· cited 17×
• Hood v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-21· cited 14×