Hooper v. Hooper
Citations
- 81 Md. 155
- 31 A. 508
- 1895 Md. LEXIS 35
Syllabus
<p>Guaranty — Measure of Liability of Guarantors — Limitations—Payment — Interest on Interest — Contribution Between Guarantors.</p> <p>A guaranty is a mercantile instrument to be liberally construed, according to the intention of the parties, as manifested by the terms of the guaranty taken in connection with the subject-matter, and in order to ascertain the intention of the parties, the circumstances of the whole transaction may be considered.</p> <p>The Statute of Limitations begins to run in favor of a guarantor from the time he is liable to suit, and this may or may not be the same time the principal debtor becomes so liable.</p> <p>When a guarantor agrees to pay a certain debt of the principal upon thirty days notice, his liability is not enforceable until after the expiration of the designated time, and the Statute of Limitations does not begin to run before that time.</p> <p>The liability of a guarantor is coextensive with that of the principal, unless it be expressly limited. And, so, where the principal debtor makes a part payment before the Statute of Limitations has attached, this fixes a new date from which the statute begins to run as to a guarantor or surety.</p> <p>Where one of several guarantors pays the debt before it has been barred by limitations, he is entitled to demand contribution from the other guarantors, and the Statute of Limitations does not begin to run against such demand until the date of such payment.</p> <p>Mere delay by the creditor in demanding payment from the principal debtor will not discharge a guarantor, unless the delay has been unreasonable and loss and injury have resulted therefrom to the guarantor. If, during the whole time, the principal debtor was unable to pay, the delay has not injured the guarantor.</p> <p>A was indebted to the W. Co. to the extent of $41,224. The W. Co. was indebted to B in the sum of $23,000, and to C in the sum of $60,000, and these sums stood to their credit on the books of the company. B and C
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the liability of the guarantors, being coextensive with [that of the principal], was [treated equally] by the statute”
- co-guarantors of principal debtor’s account with creditor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McSherry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-06-05· cited 233×
- United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettD.C. Circuit· 1989-02-03· cited 35×
- Lyon v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-10-10· cited 20×
- Weitz v. MarramCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-07· cited 15×
- Bass v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitFourth Circuit· 1934-04-03· cited 12×
- Bradshaw v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1914-05-29· cited 11×
- In Re WetzlerD. Maryland· 1996-01-11· cited 10×
- Allied Funding v. HuemmerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-02· cited 7×
- Shepter v. Johns Hopkins UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-11· cited 7×
- Mercantile Club, Inc. v. ScherrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-01-05· cited 5×
- Conestoga Title Insurance Co. v. Patchell (In re Patchell)D. Maryland· 2017-06-23· cited 1×
- Williams v. WarnerBaltimore City Superior Court· 1900-03-17
- Page v. GansterBaltimore City Court· 1923-06-01
- Selective Way Ins. v. Fireman's Fund Ins.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-02-02
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Benjamin v. HillardSupreme Court· 1860-04-16· cited 54×
- Russell v. Smith ex rel. PrinceTennessee Supreme Court· 1848-09-15· cited 46×
- McShane v. Howard BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1890-11-14· cited 38×
- Brown v. HardcastleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1885-05-15· cited 24×
- Dennis v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1860-01-12· cited 22×
- Calhoun v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia· 1878-08-15· cited 14×
- Fitzhugh v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1837-06-15· cited 8×
- Richardson v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia· 1885-02-24· cited 6×
- Bullock v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1850-12-15· cited 5×
- Vaughan v. KennanSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1881-11-15· cited 4×
- Rayner v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1868-12-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.