Hooper v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating for overbreadth a restrictive order that purported to declare all of an individual’s filings “null and void”
• vacating a restrictive order because it was overly broad when it declared “all” of an individual’s filings “null and void”
• “a blanket declaration that all filings are ‘null and void by operation of law’ is impermissible”
• unappealed ruling is res judicata and appellate court cannot review merits of unappealed ruling
• “An order that bars adequate, effective and meaningful access to the courts is unconstitutional.”
• unappealed ruling is res judicata and appellate court cannot review merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).