Skip to main content
· 12/14/2009

Hooper v. Ebenezer Senior Services & Rehabilitation Center

Citations

  • 687 S.E.2d 29
  • 386 S.C. 108
  • 2009 S.C. LEXIS 559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “equitable tolling is a doctrine that should be used sparingly and only when the interests of justice compel its use”
  • recognizing that “[t]he equitable power of a court is not bound by cast-iron rules but exists to do fairness and is flexible and adaptable to particular exigencies” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • recognizing that “[t]he equitable power of a court is not bound by cast-iron rules but exists to do fairness and is flexible and adaptable to particular exigencies” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • providing that the party claiming the statute of limitations should be tolled bears the burden of establishing sufficient facts to justify its use
  • noting the doctrine of equitable tolling should be used sparingly and only when the interests of justice demand its use
  • noting the doctrine of equitable tolling should be used sparingly and only when the interests of justice demand its use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Kittredge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.