Skip to main content
· 3/16/2007

Hooper v. City of Montgomery

Citations

  • 482 F. Supp. 2d 1330
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19387
  • 2007 WL 858411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a violation of Rule 10 where the complaint made “no attempt to identify which facts are relevant to which [] claims” and where “it [was] unclear whether facts exist which would support elements [of the claim]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Ment

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.