Hooper v. Chism

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a change from “significant weakness” to “weakness” “is a technical assessment committed to the agency’s expertise”
• stating that, as a matter of law, the SSA is required to exercise independent judgment and is not bound by the findings of lower-level evaluators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).