Hooning v. Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “if no constitutional violation by the individual defendants is established, the municipal defendants cannot be held liable under § 1983”
• holding that analysis of whether the municipal defendant failed to provide its jail officers with adequate training is unnecessary when the plaintiff-detainee fails to establish that the officers committed a constitutional violation
• holding that analysis of whether the municipal defendant failed to provide its jail officers with adequate training is unnecessary when the plaintiff-detainee fails to establish that the officers committed a constitutional violation
• \It is not enough that there was a danger of which an officer should objectively have been aware.\
• “[I]t is not enough for a plaintiff to demonstrate a question of fact whether [officers] should have knoum ” relevant details of an inmate’s condition
• “It is not enough that there was a danger of which an officer should objectively have been aware.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).