Hooker v. Thomas
Citations
- 86 Cal. 176
- 24 P. 941
- 1890 Cal. LEXIS 996
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Review of Findings — Judgment upon One Count — Failure to Find upon Other Counts. —Where the complaint alleges three distinct causes of action in three different counts, each of which is put in issue by the answer, a judgment in favor of plaintiff upon one count, which is fully sustained by the findings, will not be reversed because no findings were made, upon the issues presented by the other counts and the answer thereto. Every fact material to the judgment appealed from being found, that judgment must necessarily be affirmed; and the failure to find upon issues which might have been the basis of another and different judgment cannot justify a reversal, or be prejudicial to the appellant.</p> <p>Res Adjudicata — Distinct Causes of Action — Causes not Passed upon — Presumption of Adverse Finding — Rebutting Evidence. Where each of several causes of action alleged in a complaint are pnt in issue, the presumption is that they were litigated, and if the findings and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff cover only one of the causes of action alleged, the presumption is that the plaintiff was found and adjudged to he entitled to nothing more than was given him hy the judgment rendered; and in a second action, upon the issues not found upon, the judgment in the first action will be taken as a finding and judgment against him on such issues, in the absence of evidence; but such presumption is not conclusive, and may be rebutted by proof in the second action that, as matter of fact, the other causes of action were not litigated.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a challenge to the trial court’s failure to question a sleeping juror was “waived” where “counsel made no contemporaneous request for the trial court to conduct an inquiry and later declined to move to excuse the juror”
- reiterating that to demonstrate deficient performance, “appellant must overcome the strong presumption that counsel’s performance fell within a wide range of reasonable professional assistance”
- reiterating that to demonstrate deficient performance, “appellant must overcome the strong presumption that counsel’s performance fell within a wide range of reasonable professional assistance”
- “In the absence of evidence to the contrary, counsel’s decisions are presumed to be strategic and thus insufficient to support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
- “In the absence of evidence to the contrary, counsel’s decisions are presumed to be strategic and thus insufficient to support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Works
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.