Skip to main content
· 1/9/1995

Hooker v. Sasser

Citations

  • 893 F. Supp. 764
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10500
  • 1995 WL 443845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing for lack of standing the plaintiffs claim that other candidates' acceptance of campaign contributions from non-Tennessee citizens prevented \his qualifications as a candidate for the office of United States Senator from being judged solely and exclusively by Tennessee citizens\
  • \The Court finds that the plaintiffs' allegations of diluted voting power [and] denial of undivided loyalty ... do not identify any 'concrete and particularized' injury which they have suffered or will suffer because of the defendants' conduct.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higgins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.