Hooker v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allegation of constitutional error is insufficient for review under Crim.P. 35 when specific facts are not pleaded to support claim
• “A motion for review in the trial court as contemplated by the provisions of Crim. P. 35(b), is insufficient and may be summarily denied where, as here, it does not specify the facts which constitute the basis for the unconstitutional charge.”
• noting as significant the presence of counsel
• noting as significant the presence of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).