Skip to main content
· 7/22/1980

Hook v. Rothstein

Citations

  • 268 S.E.2d 288
  • 275 S.C. 187
  • 1980 S.C. LEXIS 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding summary judgment inappropriate when no genuine issue of fact is involved and inquiry into the facts is required to clarify the application of the law
  • Summary judgment should not be granted when inquiry into the facts is desirable to clarify the application of the law.
  • “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate only where it is perfectly clear that no genuine issue of fact is involved and inquiry into the facts is not desirable to clarify the application of the law.”
  • “This court has often noted that summary judgment is appropriate only where it is perfectly clear that no genuine issue of fact is involved and inquiry into the facts is not desirable to clarify the application of the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Littlejohn, Lewis, Ness, Gregory, Harwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.